Instruction-based image editing, which aims to modify the image faithfully towards instruction while preserving irrelevant content unchanged, has made advanced progresses. However, there still lacks a comprehensive metric for assessing the editing quality. Existing metrics either require high costs concerning human evaluation, which hinders large-scale evaluation, or adapt from other tasks and lose specified concerns, failing to comprehensively evaluate the modification of instruction and the preservation of irrelevant regions, resulting in biased evaluation. To tackle it, we introduce a novel metric Balancing Preservation Modification (BPM), that tailored for instruction-based image editing by explicitly disentangling the image into editing-relevant and irrelevant regions for specific consideration. We first identify and locate editing-relevant regions, followed by a two-tier process to assess editing quality: Region-Aware Judge evaluates whether the position and size of the edited region align with instruction, and Semantic-Aware Judge further assesses the instruction compliance within editing-relevant regions as well as content preservation within irrelevant regions, yielding comprehensive and interpretable quality assessment. Moreover, the editing-relevant region localization in BPM can be integrated into image editing approaches to improve the editing quality, manifesting its wild application. We verify the effectiveness of BPM on comprehensive instruction-editing data, and the results show that we yield the highest alignment with human evaluation compared to existing metrics, indicating efficacy.
